<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReSharper&#8217;s Live Templates for MSpec BDD framework</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marcinobel.com/index.php/resharpers-live-templates-for-mspec-bdd-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marcinobel.com/index.php/resharpers-live-templates-for-mspec-bdd-framework/</link>
	<description>.NET, ASP.NET MVC, jQuery, Ruby, Ruby on Rails, Test Driven Development, Agile</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:23:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marcin Obel</title>
		<link>http://marcinobel.com/index.php/resharpers-live-templates-for-mspec-bdd-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcin Obel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcinobel.com/?p=52#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is worth a try because way of working with it is quite different comparing to standard TDD with NUnit. Additionally it has few unique features like possibility to create specifications without theirs implementation or report generation.
No, I am not using it in ByteCarrot (yet?). MSpec currently requires a lot of configuration to be able to use it in a project and integration with tools with ReSharper&#039;s test runner or TestDriven.NET is poor. In ByteCarrot I have my own little BDD framework (few classes) similar to SpecUnit.NET based on NUnit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is worth a try because way of working with it is quite different comparing to standard TDD with NUnit. Additionally it has few unique features like possibility to create specifications without theirs implementation or report generation.<br />
No, I am not using it in ByteCarrot (yet?). MSpec currently requires a lot of configuration to be able to use it in a project and integration with tools with ReSharper&#8217;s test runner or TestDriven.NET is poor. In ByteCarrot I have my own little BDD framework (few classes) similar to SpecUnit.NET based on NUnit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesnikowski</title>
		<link>http://marcinobel.com/index.php/resharpers-live-templates-for-mspec-bdd-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesnikowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcinobel.com/?p=52#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Are you using MSpec in ByteCarrot? Is it worth a try?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you using MSpec in ByteCarrot? Is it worth a try?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
